Massachusetts Property Division Attorney
Massachusetts follows the popular “equitable division” approach to distributing property/money after divorce, which is governed by G.L. c. 208 sec. 34. The law’s goal is to distribute the property fairly, taking into account a number of factors bearing on the parties’ abilities to produce income and long-term financial prospects. Fault and gender were once significant considerations, but not anymore. The court now focuses on the economics and aims to keep the parties as close as possible to their standing of living during marriage. The larger the estate, and the greater one spouse’s financial dependence on the other, the more likely it is that there will be a long-term financial impact from the divorce, and the judge will consider that for division.
Property division is the component of divorce for which it is most important to have quality representation. Judges have broad discretion in determining what property is classified as “marital property” for the division and what is “fair” division; so a skilled, aggressive Massachusetts Property Division Lawyer can be a difference-maker in your financial standing when you walk away from the divorce.
Contact Massachusetts Property Division Lawyer Bill Farias for an Assessments at (508) 675-0464
Marital Property
To determine what property/money goes to whom, the judge must first determine what constitutes the “marital estate” – or marital property. In Massachusetts, the definition of marital property is broad and ever-expanding: it may include property acquired before marriage as well as during; and it also includes both tangible property such as houses and cars and intangible property, such as investments, portfolios, stock options, retirement, and timeshares.
Real Estate
The judge can rule that the property stays with the sole title holder, can assign it to the other party, or order that it be sold to a third party for the proceeds to be divided. If there are children involved, their living arrangements likely will impact the judge’s decision.
Retirement Plans
One of the more valuable assets in a marriage, they’re also subject to equitable division. IRA’s can be “rolled over” to the other party, and although social security benefits are technically part of the marital estate, judges may consider a party’s anticipated benefits when determining the division.
Premarital Assets
Again, even property acquired before marriage may be “marital property.” The more contribution there is to the property’s value by the “non-owner” during the marriage, the more likely it is that the judge will consider it marital property, and include it in the marital estate.
Gifts, Inheritance, Trusts:
If acquired during the marriage, they may be ordered transferred to the other spouse. Also, in certain circumstances, trust assets can be used to satisfy payment.
Advanced Degrees or Professional Licenses:
although not “property” subject to division, judges consider increased earnings potential in the division of property and alimony
Stock:
unvested stock options may be included in the marital estate for the division. Judges consider whether the stock option was given for effort before or during the marriage.
Debts:
judges can combine both parties’ debts and allocate the total debt equally; keep the respective debts with the responsible party, or do something in between.
Automatic Restraining Order
Under Supp. Prob. Ct. Rule 411, when one party files the complaint and the other gets notice, an automatic restraining order against both parties immediately goes into effect because it wouldn’t be fair once the divorce is filed, for the parties to manipulate resources for their financial benefit. Here are the restrictions:
- neither party can sell, transfer, hide … etc. property. The parties may use their resources for “reasonable expenses of living,” “ordinary and usual course of business … [or] investing,” and litigation and attorney’s fees. However, for other transactions, they need either a written agreement by both parties or a court order.
- neither party can incur further debt against the other party (e.g. credit line secured by marital residence)
- absent agreement or court order, neither party can change the beneficiary of any life insurance, pension, retirement.
- can’t cause the removal of other spouse or kids from existing medical, dental, life, auto, or disability insurance.
How the Judge Determines Division
Under G.L. c. 208 sec. 34, the judge has significant discretion in how to divide the property and considers a number of factors. The law is that there are some factors the judge must consider, and others the judge may consider (optional). However, many of them are overlapping and interrelated.
The judge must consider:
Length of the Marriage:
the longer the marriage, and the greater the financial dependence of one spouse on the other, the more likely it is that the judge will order property and money transferred from one to the other. Also, the judge may consider the spouses’ contribution to the value of the property during marriage.
Conduct of the Parties During Marriage:
Financial misconduct is likely to weigh heavily in the judge’s determination. Some examples are gambling, spending extended periods away from the home without producing income, stealing from a family business, and transferring assets in anticipation of divorce. In contrast, misconduct with little financial impact, such as adultery, matters little under the new equitable division laws. The courts focus on the finances.
Ages
Health:
whether health impacts income and ability to work
Lifestyle
Occupations:
income, ability to meet needs, the potential for future earnings. If one parent sacrificed education and income to stay at home to tend to the children, the court is likely to take that into account.
Income:
employment, trusts, rental, investments, and other sources
Vocational skills:
earnings and future earnings potential
Employability:
health, age, time out of work
Estate of Each Party:
property owned individually (again, even property acquired before marriage may be deemed “marital property.”)
Liabilities & Needs:
the court considers a source of liabilities: debt for medical reasons v. gambling
Opportunity for Future Acquisition of Capital Assets & Income: encompasses many of the factors above
Needs of Dependent Children of Marriage:
this is usually how custodial parent gets the home.
The judge may consider ( the judge has discretion whether to even consider these):
The contribution of Parties to Acquisition, Preservation, or Appreciation in Value of Respective Estates:
considering both economic and non-economic contributions, this is a factor the court uses to determine whether property acquired before marriage can be classified as “marital property.”
A contribution of Parties as Homemaker to Family Unit:
judge considers the financial impact of these non-economic contributions. If one parent sacrificed education/income to be a homemaker, the court may consider that.
Taxes:
Division of property for divorce is neither deductible by the payor nor taxable to the receiver as income.
Connection Between Property Division and Alimony
Although these are technically separate determinations that the judge makes, they’re interrelated. Alimony is an award by the court for support and maintenance from one spouse to the other. Absent an agreement by the parties, alimony merges with the divorce, and is, therefore, subject to modification in the future, at the request of either party, if there is a “material change in circumstance” (losing a job, illness affecting income). Property division, on the other hand, survives the judgment, and is not subject to modification: the judge’s decision on distribution is a final one. Although the judge makes a determination on each issue, the judge uses essentially the same factors to make both determinations, so for practical purposes, the property division affects the alimony and vice versa.
It’s important to speak to an attorney as soon as possible to ensure that you’re taking the right steps to protect yourself. Also, you need a skilled litigator to get you what you’re entitled to. Contact Massachusetts Property Division Lawyer Bill Farias for a CONSULTATION at (508) 675-0464 or submit the contact form on this page.
Asset Division: Real Estate, Retirement, Investment & Bank Accounts, Businesses, Debts, and General.
If you’re going through a divorce, it’s important to understand the complexities of dividing assets and debts. This can include everything from real estate and retirement accounts to investments, bank accounts, businesses, and debts. In this section, we’ve compiled educational material and resources to help you understand the different types of assets and debts that may need to be divided during divorce proceedings, as well as the legal and financial considerations involved. With this information, you can make informed decisions that prioritize your interests and help you move forward with confidence.
Articles Related to Property Division
FAQs
There’s an “equitable distribution” of the marital assets in divorce, which essentially means the property must be divided fairly. This includes real estate, retirement accounts and other investments, cash, businesses, and everything else the parties own. Age, income, health, assets, and contributions to the marriage are some of the factors the court considers in division. The longer the marriage, and the more equal the contributions from the parties – including non-economic contributions like home-making and child-rearing – the more likely it is that the property will be divided equally.
Retirement funds, like all marital property, is subject to division in MA. The principle that determines how the funds are divided is called “equitable distribution,” which essentially means the court aims to divide the properly “fairly,” which does not necessarily mean equally. In some cases, the marital property is divided equally, but in others, one party is awarded more than the other. There are a number of factors involved in the property division analysis. Once it’s determined how the retirement moneys will be divided, the money in a 401K or IRA for example is usually transferred by rolling it over into an account for the other spouse. If it’s a pension, documents called Qualified Domestic Relations Orders are processed to legally grant the recipient spouse a right to a certain percentage of the pension when it’s eventually paid out.
It depends. Inherited property is technically subject to division in MA because ALL property that either party owns at the time of divorce is part of the “marital pot.” However, the party inheriting the property may get a credit for it, depending on the circumstances. For example, if the property was inherited before the marriage and it was kept separately, the recipient has a better chance of keeping all of it. Similarly, if the property was inherited at the tail end of the marriage, close to or after the time of filing for divorce, there’s also a higher probability that the recipient will keep all of it. Generally, the longer the marriage and the more intertwined the inheritance became with the marital finances, the more likely it is to be subject to division.
A pension is considered marital property and is therefore subject to division. The longer the marriage and the more value the pension accrued during the marriage, the more likely it is that the ex spouse will be entitled to a portion of it.
If your spouse is hiding money, it’s best to address the issue as soon as possible. The moment you suspect this is happening, you should plan to consult a divorce attorney for advice on how to proceed. The longer you wait and the more money that’s siphoned out of the marriage, the more difficult it will be to trace and recover. The attorney will likely file for divorce quickly and possibly ask for a court order to address the conduct. The attorney then may conduct “discovery” to obtain information about where the money’s going and how much is missing. Cases involving hidden cash are particularly challenging because of the lack of verifying documents and overall corroborative evidence.
The answer is: it depends (damn lawyers never give a straight answer!). Under Alimony Reform, which went into effect in MA on 3/1/2012, if the spouse receiving alimony is “cohabitating” with another individual for at least 3 consecutive months, the payor may file to reduce, suspend or terminate alimony. However, in MA, this recent change in the law technically only applies to cases that were finalized after the passage of the new law on 3/1/12. So if your case was resolved before then, you can’t rely on the “cohabitation” provision of Alimony Reform to reduce your alimony. Nonetheless, even if your case was disposed of before passage of the new law, it may still be worth consulting with an attorney to determine whether you can proceed with a modification of your alimony order on the theory that the person your ex is living with has decreased the recipient’s financial “need,” and therefore your alimony should be reduced anyway.
Hiding assets can result in significant repercussions in divorce. First, and perhaps most importantly, it likely kills the guilty party’s credibility with the court. If there are any issues that are brought before the judge on which credibility is an issue, that person is at a severe disadvantage. Also, regardless of any other issues, the judge has the authority to order a disproportionate division of assets, and has some discretion on alimony and child support payments. The party hiding assets may suffer consequences in those areas. Finally, the judge may penalize the guilty party by ordering that party to pay some of the other party’s attorney’s fees. Not worth it.
Yes. However, depending on the nature of the hidden assets and how long ago they were hidden, it may be difficult. In a divorce, the parties may conduct “discovery” to gain information from the other side. This includes asking them questions under oath either in written form or by questioning them at a deposition. In addition, either by subpoena or by requests directly to the other party, the parties may also request from each other documents that may provide evidence of hidden assets. However, if a party is hiding cash, or using money orders or bank checks, the information is much more difficult to discover.
Maybe. All debt accumulated during the marriage may be included as joint debt for purposes of division of assets and debts in divorce. Whether the judge actually transfers responsibility for medical debt to the other party depends on a number of factors, including how the property and the rest of the debts are divided, the alimony order, among other factors.